Post by account_disabled on Jan 2, 2024 5:13:53 GMT -6
Afor granting a new trial term. . The Court deliberating rejects the request to postpone the resolution of the case. . The case being in a state of trial the president gives the floor to the present parties who show that they leave it to the discretion of the Court to resolve the exception of unconstitutionality. . The representative of the Public Ministry submits conclusions rejecting as unfounded the exception of unconstitutionality invoking in this sense the case law of the Constitutional Court. COURT considering the documents and works of the file notes the following.
By the Conclusion of May issued in File no. . Bucharest District Country Email List Court The criminal section notified the Constitutional Court with the exception of the unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. of the Criminal Procedure Code. The exception was raised by Ioana Sfrial on the occasion of the settlement of the complaint against a decision not to send to court. . In justifying the exception of unconstitutionality its author claims in essence that the provisions of art. para. of the Code of Criminal free access to justice the right to a fair trial the right to defense and the right to two degrees of jurisdiction in criminal matters because the solution pronounced by the is final. . Bucharest District Court.
The criminal section considers that the provisions of art. para. of the Criminal Procedure Code are unconstitutional in relation to art. para. and art. para. of the Constitution since the fair process also requires in the matter of nonprosecution or nonprosecution solutions considering the legal consequences of these procedural acts the existence of a control of legality and thoroughness regarding the judges decision control carried out through a means of attack. . According to art. para. from Law n.
By the Conclusion of May issued in File no. . Bucharest District Country Email List Court The criminal section notified the Constitutional Court with the exception of the unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. of the Criminal Procedure Code. The exception was raised by Ioana Sfrial on the occasion of the settlement of the complaint against a decision not to send to court. . In justifying the exception of unconstitutionality its author claims in essence that the provisions of art. para. of the Code of Criminal free access to justice the right to a fair trial the right to defense and the right to two degrees of jurisdiction in criminal matters because the solution pronounced by the is final. . Bucharest District Court.
The criminal section considers that the provisions of art. para. of the Criminal Procedure Code are unconstitutional in relation to art. para. and art. para. of the Constitution since the fair process also requires in the matter of nonprosecution or nonprosecution solutions considering the legal consequences of these procedural acts the existence of a control of legality and thoroughness regarding the judges decision control carried out through a means of attack. . According to art. para. from Law n.